By Soni Daniel, Kingsley Omonobi and Johnbosco Agbakwuru
Abuja
— Despite strident denials by top officials of the National Assembly,
it has been discovered that the legislators padded the 2016 budget to
the tune of N481 billion.
Documents obtained
by Vanguard showed that apart from padding the budget with the huge sum,
forcing the Presidency to raise alarm over it, NASS also unilaterally
jerked the votes meant for constituency projects from N60 billion to
N100 billion.
But the Chairman of
the House of Representatives Committee on Appropriation, Abdul Jibrin,
who was fired last week, had said the Speaker allowed 10 committee
chairmen to insert projects worth N284 billion and washed his hands off
the illegal action.
The House leadership, however, said Jubrin was fired for fixing the budget, a development he vehemently denied.
Vanguard found out
from the document exclusively obtained from the National Assembly that
the lawmakers ingeniously removed some key projects proposed by the
executive or drastically reduced their costs and introduced many others
not contemplated by the Presidency which prepared the budget.
Among the projects
which votes were surreptitiously jerked up without the knowledge of the
executive, were Nigerian railway modernization project: Lagos - Kano
standard gauge rail line project, which cost was raised by N32.5 billion
and the consultancy dredging and river training works (N609 million)
under the Ministry of Transportation.
Others, according
to the document, are the Code of Conduct Bureau which had N4.4billion
added to its vote, provision of broadband Internet Service to National
Assembly by Nigcomsat, N318 million, Training and Consultancy for
Nigcomsat 2 Project, N3.5 billion etc, in the Ministry of
Communications.
Most scandalous,
according to the document, is the case of Ministry of Works, Power and
Housing where 82 new projects, principally roads, with a total provision
of about N50.63 billion, were inserted in the budget.
The Presidency,
which reviewed the budget, said: "A large number of these projects are
outside the mandate of the relevant Ministry (e.g. the Ministry of
Agriculture and Rural Development, and the Ministry of Works, Power
& Housing); or statutorily outside the FGN's mandate (like
intra-city and state road projects); or cannot be implemented as there
are no designs or costings made for them.
No comments:
Post a Comment